Automated templates
Jurisdiction-specific drafts with guided intake wizards and controlled export workflows that lock baselines.
Open documentsA considered approach to legal work
Draft from guided templates, review contracts, and keep your work in one place. Legal document automation for the people behind every agreement.
Start with an account. Choose a paid plan when you need exports.
Agreement / 001
A shared starting point for your next conversation.
01. Confidential information
02. Term and termination
Review how long confidentiality obligations continue after the agreement ends.
Your review comes before the final export.
Illustrative preview. Your document, your decisions.
01 — Platform
Each module ships with reviewer rigor on by default. Templates enforce intake, review surfaces rationale, the assistant stays scoped, and agents move work without losing the audit trail.
Jurisdiction-specific drafts with guided intake wizards and controlled export workflows that lock baselines.
Open documentsStandardized clause language and safer alternatives grounded in real review outputs and override patterns.
Compare clausesAsk for template guidance, review summaries, and clause alternatives — with explicit, scoped safety boundaries.
Try the assistantTask-scoped legal agents for NDA drafting, review action plans, and structured intake capture.
See agents02 — Workflow
A linear path through repeatable contract work — with structured handoffs between automation and counsel. Each stage carries audit, rationale, and ownership forward.
Generate from controlled templates. Required intake fields and clause baselines aren't optional.
Output → review queueClassify risk, capture rationale, prioritize edits. Reviewers see context, not just diffs.
High-risk → escalateSummaries, template guidance, and safer alternatives — bounded so the assistant never plays lawyer.
Always non-advisoryMaterial risk routes to lawyer intake with jurisdiction, urgency, and full document context attached.
Urgency lanes03 — Operating paths
Document automation works only when the operating model is clear before rollout. Choose the path that maps to your team structure and reviewer ownership — and adapt from there.
Improve associate first-draft consistency and deliver client-ready contracts faster, without diluting partner review.
Improve intake quality, reduce negotiation rework, and route material risk into measurable, owned lanes.
04 — 90-day rollout
Teams that launch wide without controls create hidden risk. A defensible rollout begins with one or two contract families and uses clause-level rationale as a release gate before broader self-service.
Set intake policy, escalation triggers, and template ownership before any draft ships.
Pilot the workflow with reviewer calibration sessions and full audit logging on.
Use negotiation outcomes and override patterns to refine the playbook.
Open additional template families only after quality and turnaround stabilize.
05 — How it works
Keep the details, draft, and review close together. Guided intake creates a starting point, clause findings help focus your attention, and export controls keep the final decision with you.
Templates require the fields your reviewers actually depend on. Nothing ships until intake is complete.
Drafts combine the selected template with your intake answers, ready for you to edit and review.
Findings carry clause type, risk classification, and a written rationale — so reviewers see the why.
Escalations attach the underlying rationale, jurisdiction, and urgency lane before they reach a lawyer.
Open a saved draft, revisit a completed review, or manage a document's retention from your workspace. The next step stays within reach.
06 — FAQ
Want a deeper walk-through? Book a product walkthrough with our solutions team — we'll mirror your contract families end-to-end.
Book demoLaw firms, in-house legal teams, and legal operations practitioners running repeatable document and review workflows. It's strongest where the same contract families show up week after week.
Create drafts from governed templates, run AI contract review, use a scoped legal assistant, and execute task-scoped agents — all under one audit trail and access model.
High-risk or low-confidence findings route into structured lawyer intake with jurisdiction context, urgency lane, and the underlying clause rationale attached. Counsel sees a decision, not a wall of text.
Retention defaults to 30 days. Custom retention windows are configurable per workspace, and one-click hard delete is available from the document vault for any matter.
No — and explicitly so. LegalDoc is non-advisory by design. It protects legal judgment from repetitive operational noise so reviewers spend their hours on material risk.
Ready when you are
Ship contracts through workflows built for law firms, in-house legal, and legal ops teams — with reviewer rigor on by default.
Not legal advice. Drafting and review assistance only.