Features
Legal automation and contract lifecycle features by workflow
Choose the workflow module that matches your current bottleneck: draft speed, review quality, execution consistency, or contract lifecycle management handoff quality.
Choose a workflow based on your current bottleneck
Teams evaluating contract lifecycle management software features usually need one module to solve first. Pick the workflow that addresses your immediate operating constraint, then expand only after quality and escalation metrics hold steady.
Documents
Best for legal teams standardizing first-draft quality.
Use structured intake and controlled templates to produce repeatable first drafts with export governance.
View feature detailsContract Review
Best for teams triaging risk at clause level.
Run async contract analysis, classify risk by clause, and route material issues with decision-ready context.
View feature detailsAI Assistant
Best for teams that need guided execution, not open-ended chat.
Use scoped assistant actions to summarize findings, find templates, and propose safer fallback language.
View feature detailsAgents
Best for legal ops teams automating repeatable task chains.
Run auditable agent workflows for intake, drafting, review summaries, and escalation preparation.
View feature detailsFeature comparison for buying decisions
| Feature | Use case | Inputs required | Primary outputs | Escalation trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Documents | Generate governed first drafts for repeat agreements. | Template selection + required intake fields. | Draft content, preview, export artifacts. | Escalate when non-standard terms exceed fallback policy. |
| Contract Review | Prioritize negotiation risk quickly. | Uploaded agreement + jurisdiction context. | Clause findings, risk rationale, action summary. | Escalate high-risk or low-confidence findings. |
| AI Assistant | Speed reviewer decisions with controlled prompts. | Prompt + workflow context. | Template guidance, summaries, rewrite suggestions. | Escalate ambiguous, high-impact legal requests. |
| Agents | Automate repeat legal operations tasks. | Agent-specific run payload. | Run logs, output artifacts, status history. | Escalate failed or high-risk runs to manual review. |
How these modules work together
A common production sequence is Draft, Review, Assist, then Automate. This keeps human legal judgment focused on material risk while repetitive workflow steps remain controlled and measurable.
Which feature should a new team start with?
Most teams start with Documents plus Contract Review, then add Assistant and Agents after reviewer quality controls stabilize.
Can teams use all four features in one workflow?
Yes. A common flow is Draft in Documents, triage in Contract Review, refine with Assistant, then automate repeated paths with Agents.
Do these features replace legal judgment?
No. They improve operational execution and escalation quality, while final legal advice remains the responsibility of licensed counsel.
To evaluate buyer fit by team type, continue to the solutions hub.